koЯnut

click on one of our sponsors! OR REMOVE ADS

Okay...the anal thread just got me thinking. What is exactaly the line where virginity is crossed.
If a girl does anal but not vag penetration is she still a virgin? What about oral sex?
Let me know what you think. I'll post my opinion later.

Realtalguy

I think it is only defined as coitus... or vaginal penis insertion...

throatyogurt

I personally think that each version of sex should have it's own virginity. Done anal, but no vaginal; then a vaginal virgin. But, in the big picture, when you cross into penetration (not counting oral - Bill Clinton is right on this one!!!!!!!!) I would consider your virginity to be lost. Anything I haven't done I would consider myself to be a virgin in. I am a skydiving version, for example. That is my take on it.

michaeljohn

this was brought up before this forum and the answer is very simple. a virgin is defined by whether or not she has had penetration of her vagina by a penis. any other sexual contact does not constitute loss of virginity. otherwise, the word has been redefined. ass, mouth, hands, feet, breasts, legs, arms, etc. a girl can handle a penis in all those ways. if she does so with any part other than her vagina she is still a virgin. she may be a slut, kinky, or a tease, but unless she has taken it in her cootch, she is a virgin. also, if anything other than a penis invades her vagina, she is still a virgin.

___________________________________________

koЯnut

I did do a search for this topic and didn't find anything.

Okay...so what If a guy is a virgin but he does anal on a girl(and cums). Is he considered a virgin?

michaeljohn

same thing, if he doesn't enter the cootch with his penis, he is a virgin.

___________________________________________

druelt

I agree here also...virginity is with a penis and vagina only, imo.

Chameleon Grrl

I can't help but mention that so far this thread is exteremly heterosexist. By these defintions, gay men and lesbians who have never experimented with straight sex are still all virgins. Is this really what you guys believe or did you just not think it through completely?

koЯnut

Finally!! I was waiting for more arguement. This is a very, very good point C.G. I don't agree with all the above statements. To me sexual penetration is grounds for not being a virgin.

Virgin:

Main Entry: 1vir·gin
Pronunciation: 'v&r-j&n
Function: noun
: a person who has not had sexual intercourse


Apparently anal isn't intercourse to your guy's standard.

michaeljohn

Yes, by definition they are virgins. Heterosexual virgins. They are in their own class as homosexuals. They are sexually experienced, but virgins to real intercourse. Anything else redefines the word virgin.

___________________________________________

koЯnut

I'm sorry mfinley, I just don't see the logic here. Intercourse is intercourse. How is it different if you cum in an ass or a vag?? The act of sexual intercouse can't be limited to just penis/vagina penetration.

michaeljohn

The logic is simple. You are confusing the word virgin with the term sexual experience. I don't understand why
people wish to redefine the word virgin!

___________________________________________

koЯnut

Do you consider anal intercourse?? If so the argument is over. The definition says it right there!!

: a person who has not had sexual intercourse

michaeljohn

Uhhh, no it isn't over. Two guys ramming each other don't have a vagina. Again, you are trying to redefine virgin.

Sexual intercourse can come in all types of styles, with all types of equipment and body parts. But virgin means
coitus with a penis and vagina. A girl who climaxes while riding a horse or riding a bike does not lose her virginity.

A boy who sticks his pecker in a tube doesn't either.

But both this boy and girl have experienced sexual stimulation, and experience.

Key word, is virgin. Everything else not involving a penis and a vagina together is something else.

___________________________________________