joerockhead

click on one of our sponsors! OR REMOVE ADS

biggest fundraising scandal in American history.

Hillary Clinton took no less than $2 million from Peter Paul for her 2000 senate bid. this is all documented on video, audio, photo, and paper.

then she states in an interview that she would never take money from Peter Paul because he had a criminal conviction years previous. the fact remained that she did take the money and in fact, in writing, requested from Peter Paul an addition $100,000. the source of the funds raised for Hillary on behalf of Peter Paul were omitted and concealed...essentially she laundered $2 million+ to use for her campaign.

Peter Paul filed a suit against Hillary and Bill Clinton for fraud and defamation of character. he was investigated and detained in connection with brokerage accounts.

when the trial came up the judge was Howard Matz and was appointed by the Clintons to oversee the trial in which Peter Paul was suing them. the judge made it a point to go so far as to ruin the credibility and reputation of Peter Paul further by calling him a corrupt con man who couldn't be trusted.

the case is continuing in California courts.

so Hillary Clinton took and laundered over $2 million from a man and ruined his reputation. she has violated the laws of candidate fundraising and then made all attempts to cover up any and all information pertaining to it.

___________________________________________


Visit the worlds best website -
www.badass67.com - Black Sunshine

KarlMiller132

John Edwards

Krasch

And why would anyone be surprised at what she's done?

Lazer

She's a cunt. plain and simple.
We're doomed..

Juan.©amaney

Is it really any surprise anymore when it comes to politicians and how they aquire their money?

___________________________________________

Krasch

You'd be doomed if she get in the White House perhaps, but that's far from certain. She may not even get the Democrat nomination.

Krasch

Could we not call this something like "Whitewater 2.0"?

civilityandlies

The politician's hypocracy: they try to raise more money to get
a job than they are paid FOR the job.

For some reason, when I hook her up to my agressive lies and hypocracy meter for extreemly popular people, she scores at the top of the list now. Bush doesn't score as high because his menace upon the masses is at least blatantly far more predictable.
People expect so little of Bush I am capable of pity toward him far more than the people who supported him (holy knuckleheads, twice! no less).
HER deception and raw aggression is disturbing because people 1. Want her to HELP them. 2. Believe her approach, given her strength of character *oh shit, did I say that?* will actually BE far more helpful rather than mostly disgusting.

schutzenkonig

Is there somewhere in particular you got that name from? Hopefully not watergate...

lovesit

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitewater_(controversy)

Krasch

Thank you...

If you believe the Clintons about Whitewater, then Vince Foster shot himself in the head, then proceeded to lay down with the gun still in his hand like he was going to take a nap.

SUUUUURRRRRREEEE, and the Easter Bunny is real too.

The Clintons are a pair of political animals who care about nothing but grabbing power for themselves, and will do ANYTHING to get it. Break any law, commit any offense. They were joined at the hip when Bill was President and if you think things would be any different with Hillary in charge you are fooling yourself.

BackdoorJesus

<yawn> oh yeah the Clinton's are so corrupt...completely unlike ALL politicians. And they'll do anything for power? Yeah - also completely unlike ALL politicians; and golden boy Obama's included in that group too.

And anyone who thinks we're "doomed" just because one moron or another gets elected is a drama queen.

Please - people have been predicting our "doom" at the hands of the president since G.Washington.

So please spare us the anti-Clinton anti-Demopublican spiel because they ALL suck ass & it's not fair to the others to single out a couple of people just because they happened to work the system better than some of the others have.

___________________________________________

Krasch

Sure politicians are corrupt (even if not at the onset they all get that way). Power currupts after all. And while they all do lust for power, some do so more than others. McCain actually shoots himself in the foot in that quest by being such a maverick to his own party, who are of course the ones who have the real power in the Republican party as THEY decide who gets to run for the Presidency.

But the Clintons take that corruption and avarice to a whole new level.