HEY YOU!!!, Our records indicate that you have never posted to our site before! Why not make your first post today by saying hello to our community in our new people forums. To access all the good good stuff you need to post, post, and post more.


Support Webrats Forum with your Subscription. Only $5.95 per month!
Adult lounge Access • Private Messaging • GAMES •
Please click here for more details • Please click here to subscribe
Go Back   WR > Other > Archive
User Name
Password
Register Help Desk Music Uploads Live Cams Arcade Upgrade Account Mark Forums Read
THREAD CLOSED
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-20-2004, 05:00 PM   #106
Jimi
Banned by pornerators
High Score: 1131 Champion!
High Score: 14096 Champion!
High Score: 141 Champion!
High Score: 5650 Champion!
High Score: 24306 Champion!
 
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 10,153/4.73
Threads: 318
MALE
Re: What's The Virginity Line?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mfinley
I agree with your points on other sexual contact not being pure or chaste, etc. But the act of doing things other than coitus do not constitute a loss of virginity.



By definition, virginal is chaste, pure, and without experience. Therefore, your theories are conflicting.
Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl |
Old 12-20-2004, 05:01 PM   #107
michaeljohn
Scotlands finest SuperMod
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Glasgow Scotland Heritage: Scotsman; Pict
Posts: 40,135/21.59
Threads: 2825
Scotland MALE
Re: What's The Virginity Line?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimi
Uhm.... mfinley, it says OTHER than penetration of the vagina by the penis.You're skipping over words now.

I am not skipping over any words at all. Fine if these acts are considered sexual intercourse, but as i have said before, you are redefining all variations of sexual intercourse to mean loss of virginity. The sexual intercourse definition is what is vague here and how it affects, not virginity itself.
___________________________________________
The 4th Dynasty begins now!!
1948-54, 1979-1988, 1999-2002, 2008-?


---------------------------

Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl |
Old 12-20-2004, 05:03 PM   #108
michaeljohn
Scotlands finest SuperMod
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Glasgow Scotland Heritage: Scotsman; Pict
Posts: 40,135/21.59
Threads: 2825
Scotland MALE
Re: What's The Virginity Line?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimi
By definition, virginal is chaste, pure, and without experience. Therefore, your theories are conflicting.

And you are ignoring the traditional meaning of virgin, the one I have implied all along. First dick in the pussy! Break
that cherry. This is what traditionally constitutes a loss of virginity and it has been pointed out countless times.
This is where you folks are trying to redefine virginity and skirting the issues I raise.
___________________________________________
The 4th Dynasty begins now!!
1948-54, 1979-1988, 1999-2002, 2008-?


---------------------------

Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl |
Old 12-20-2004, 05:05 PM   #109
Jimi
Banned by pornerators
High Score: 1131 Champion!
High Score: 14096 Champion!
High Score: 141 Champion!
High Score: 5650 Champion!
High Score: 24306 Champion!
 
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 10,153/4.73
Threads: 318
MALE
Re: What's The Virginity Line?

No, I am pulling the exact definition. There is no tradition in definitions. I assure you that in the Biblical times, since you like to bring those up, had someone been done in the ass, she still would have been just as scrutinized as she would have if she had penile/vaginal intercourse.

This is the definition, and you can't argue with the definition. It is fact, definitions are what support our language.
Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl |
Sponsored Links
REMOVE ADS
Old 12-20-2004, 05:09 PM   #110
michaeljohn
Scotlands finest SuperMod
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Glasgow Scotland Heritage: Scotsman; Pict
Posts: 40,135/21.59
Threads: 2825
Scotland MALE
Re: What's The Virginity Line?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimi
No, I am pulling the exact definition. There is no tradition in definitions. I assure you that in the Biblical times, since you like to bring those up, had someone been done in the ass, she still would have been just as scrutinized as she would have if she had penile/vaginal intercourse.

This is the definition, and you can't argue with the definition. It is fact, definitions are what support our language.

And this thread is played out. I rest my case. Closed and transfered to archive forum.

Maybe you guys should get on the change the definition of virgin bandwagon
___________________________________________
The 4th Dynasty begins now!!
1948-54, 1979-1988, 1999-2002, 2008-?


---------------------------

Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl |
THREAD CLOSED

WR > Other > Archive
Reload this Page What's The Virginity Line?
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes  Rate This Thread 
Rate This Thread:

Powered by Waldo 12345678910 1213 14 15 Copyright © 2000-2005 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Page generated in 1.14273906 seconds (94.07% PHP - 5.93% MySQL) with 13 queries
206.212.255.29 Message Boards and Forums Directory