Originally Posted by Krasch

Mountain top removal that has taken YEARS if not DECADES to accomplish worse than nature? How about Mt. St. Helens. or Krackatoa. Most or all of both those mountains were gone in minutes, not just the top, and we had nothing to do with the cause of either. You're guilty of hyperbole yet again.

And just because the government wants more nuclear weapons stockpiled doesn't have to mean they intend to use them. They're simply out to maintain a status quo of mutually assured destruction, which is the main thing stopping rogue states that have nukes from actually considering using them against others. Your argument here is flawed. It's the same as saying that if I buy a handgun then I must be planning to use it to shoot my neighbor, not for target shooting or just plain collecting...

Originally Posted by Krasch

Well you're certainly drinking the Kool-Aid, but suffice it to say there's little chance we're going to agree here...

Originally Posted by ddoubleez

Then I will close with the fact that over 600000 children are born every year, with cognitive disorders linked to mercury that comes from coal fired powerplants.... This is the energy source for nearly half of north americas electricity......

Do I need to remind anyone that the USDA recommends only 4 servings of fatty fish PER YEAR, because of the methal mercury that occurs from burning coal.... It is against the law for a pregnant woman to eat sword fish.....

And the Kool-aid is great.....

Originally Posted by knightsoccer

I think everyone agrees that pollution is bad. The only difference is, we don't invent global catastrophes to try and push forward our agenda by telling everyone they'll die if they don't agree. This makes the opinion of environmentalist scientists just as biased as that of the oil companies.

Originally Posted by Krasch

Seconded there Lazer...