View Full Version : WWE vs TNA
09-21-2005, 12:36 AM
For all you Wrestling guys who do you think has the better advantage World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) or Total NonStop Action Wrestling (TNA)
what do you mean by better advantage? They both have awesome talents.. well, TNA has xpac, or 123 kid, or whoever the fuck he is.. I could kick his ass.
but both are decent shows. I dont get to see TNA as much as WWE..
WWE of course is huge just because.. its.. WWE..
TNA has moved over to Spike. That should help it..
but Im not sure one has much of an advantage over the other.
09-21-2005, 07:12 AM
I dont get to watch any wrestling anymore..
WWE has my all time favortie wrestler- -- Undertaker.
TNA has my second all time favorite wrestler -- Jeff Hardy
and nobody has my 3rd fav.. Brock Lesnar.
09-21-2005, 07:24 PM
TNA is pretty good, but WWE will always be on top. As tsmo said, switching over to Spike should help TNA some. It is fun to watch and I hope that it gets more popular and better.
they both have talent in spades. The question is, who has the better writers. That I can't answer (yet) since I haven't seen TNA.
09-21-2005, 08:38 PM
Isn't Hogan backing the development of TNA now? Not that he will wrestle, but as promotion that could be big.
I wonder if Vince has a finacial backing to it as well. Now that it's on Spike and WWE runs promo's during RAW.
09-23-2005, 11:36 PM
I believe that Vince Bought TNA, with Hogan. It has moved to to Spike and will be aired much more.
I do not like it as much, but I think once I start watching it, I will like it.
RAW is getting bad. Undertaker and Batista are the only ones I like enough to watch it on a Friday!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.9 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.