Slight bleeding and abrasions are not totally uncommon during normal sex. ,very typic

[DB]

qoute from billpl
The blood on the T shirt was so little it took chemicals and a microscope to find it.
Slight bleeding and abrasions are not totally uncommon during normal sex. While it is more typical from rape, it is also very typical from a "quickie".


this was so important I thought it needed its own thread

[DB]

Slight bleeding and abrasions are not totally uncommon


Posted by: Jon-Erik - December 26, 2003 (15:18)

Most criminal analysts are of the mind that the VERY MINOR tearing in the rear forchette area of KF's vagina is quite CONSISTENT with normal sexual intercourse whether lubricated or not. The only person so far that has actually said anything to the contrary about that is the rape nurse who examined the so-called victim. Its just possible she has an agenda in this and you need to bear that in mind, or at least have an open mind.

The 'blood' evidence on KB's shirt was not 'slopped' on there as you infer. Apparently it was 'swiped' on and probably some time after the intercourse occured. This is not evidence of rape and there are a thousand reasons for that to possibly occur. I'll bet that some times after sex with your girlfriend (if you do that sort of thing) you would find a blood smear or two. Why, because its very common during normal, regular, undeviant intercourse for that to occur between a man and a woman.

As for the 'bruises' and photos of such you claim are 'all over the news' again you are out of touch. There was a single FAINT bruise oblong in shape and about the size of half a penny on KF's JAW and NOT A SINGLE BRUISE ON HER NECK OR ANY OTHER PARTY OF HER BODY. Such a bruise is more consistent with popping a pimple between thumb and forefinger than forced rape or any act of violence.