View Single Post
Old 06-25-2009, 04:57 PM   #38 (permalink)
rexhamer
Lakers > Celtics, Boston Sucks, michaeljohn > rexhamer, My logic is flawed, I am a bigger baby than Glenn "Big Baby" Davis
 
rexhamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: boston
Posts: CXXVIII
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
rexhamer sux schweddy ballzach rexhamer sux schweddy ballzach rexhamer sux schweddy ballzach rexhamer sux schweddy ballzach rexhamer sux schweddy ballzach rexhamer sux schweddy ballzach rexhamer sux schweddy ballzach rexhamer sux schweddy ballzach rexhamer sux schweddy ballzach rexhamer sux schweddy ballzach rexhamer sux schweddy ballzach
Points: 216, Level: 2
Points: 216, Level: 2 Points: 216, Level: 2 Points: 216, Level: 2
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Re: Celtics vs. Lakers - The Final Chapter

The scorecard – I gave you a chance to explain the obvious hypocrisy of including conference finals wins & losses, while counting only championship finals wins (where are the Lakers’ 15 finals losses?). Your response:

Quote:
Originally Posted by michaeljohn
Gee, the Celtics hold only one advantage, that’s why their title edge is listed.

But what about the Lakers Finals losses? When you don’t like a rebuttal, you just ignore it. (We will see more of this as we go along.) You offered no answer to my question, confirming that your scorecard is biased. It is all based on YOUR opinion of what constitutes a relevant category. Or should I say you have “Cherry Picked” the categories? Hypocrisy rears its ugly head again! This is certainly in conflict with this statement:

Quote:
Originally Posted by michaeljohn
by creating a scorecard free from bias
Now let’s look at your attempt to remove 9-2, 17-3 and 14-15 from the scorecard by speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by michaeljohn
First, I would like to say that these categories are placed as relevant and important by Celtics_55’s opinion. They are backed up by facts which I maintain are “Cherry Picked”. Does everyone else think they are as important? Well, Celtics_55 has just told you they do! Let’s expose the flawed logic with this. First and foremost, we have the IEttR come into play. The words “any fan” presumes “every fan”. The words “so prominent in any fan’s discussion”, means I can pick “any fans” or you can pick “any fans” and interview them to see what they talk about! If they aren’t Celtics fans, I doubt seriously many of the fans will bring these categories up at all, let alone prominently! Check any basketball forum. They talk about every basketball notion you can imagine, except this! Furthermore, since he claims it will happen and be “prominent in any fan’s discussion”, he is determining their relevance by…drum roll please…..SPECULATION!

That in itself immediately and officially eliminates 9-2 and 17-3 from this debate.
Let’s take this in pieces.

Quote:
Originally Posted by michaeljohn
First and foremost, we have the IEttR come into play.
Since I have already shown that you have no actual exceptions, this statement, and any references to your use of this, are refuted.
rexhamer is offline   Share with Facebook