View Single Post
Old 05-22-2009, 01:37 PM   #26 (permalink)
rexhamer
Lakers > Celtics, Boston Sucks, michaeljohn > rexhamer, My logic is flawed, I am a bigger baby than Glenn "Big Baby" Davis
 
rexhamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: boston
Posts: CXXVIII
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
rexhamer sux schweddy ballzach rexhamer sux schweddy ballzach rexhamer sux schweddy ballzach rexhamer sux schweddy ballzach rexhamer sux schweddy ballzach rexhamer sux schweddy ballzach rexhamer sux schweddy ballzach rexhamer sux schweddy ballzach rexhamer sux schweddy ballzach rexhamer sux schweddy ballzach rexhamer sux schweddy ballzach
Points: 216, Level: 2
Points: 216, Level: 2 Points: 216, Level: 2 Points: 216, Level: 2
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Re: NBA thread 2008/09

So much to say, but here is just a sample of typical MJ ducking the issue. I asked for a justification of his hypocrisy:
Quote:
Originally Posted by rexhamer
3) Lastly, in typical MJ fashion, we get much verbiage, but not a single word admitting, acknowledging, conceding, apologizing for, or even refuting the obvious hypocrisy he is guilty of in this thread.
and we get this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by michaeljohn View Post

3) Big words pal, reread what I said yesterday. This is Webrats. Fun and Stupidity at its best. You want to come here and lie, expect to get bitch-slapped.
And here is what was said "yesterday":

Quote:
Originally Posted by michalejohn
aww, did my little smack hurt you and your one-and-done Celtics? This is Webrats, grow some balls. besides as noted above, looked like you quit this place.
Still no justification, just some lame excuse that he thought I was no longer here - and that makes it OK to be hypocritical? And note also that it began two months ago.

Secondly, I have noted twice separately so far that all this debate can be made clearer to Webrats members if MJ is willing to share the other site in some fashion (even if that were to be by PM invite). And despite suggesting it twice - not a single word from MJ! What could he be hiding? I've got nothing to hide. Let's let others see our blogs and replies and judge for themselves.

Yet obviously the prospect of other members judging this debate is so frightening to MJ that he figures if he just ignores this issue it will go away.

Instead, he has decided to spoon feed his selected pieces to the forum. Talk about "Cherry-Picking"! Oh, that's right - according to the MJ School of Debate, "anything goes" and more hypocrisy is par for the course.

So there you have it - two simple questions to answer.
rexhamer is offline   Reply With Quote Share with Facebook